RECORDED MUSIC INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Eritrea
Africa
Potential of Recorded Music
MEDI aims to highlight music’s potential as a global tool to reduce poverty and drive economic growth by estimating its worldwide value. This includes projecting how that value could increase if every country had supportive institutions in place, such as appropriate legislation, infrastructure, and policies, and if music achieved full market penetration. We are currently collecting data in each country to support this analysis.
Coming soon
Coming soon
Coming soon
Local Impact
Over time, MEDI will conduct country-level economic and social impact assessments to better understand how to unlock sustainable growth within national music ecosystems.
Coming soon
Coming soon
Coming soon
Coming soon
Coming soon
Coming soon
Socioeconomic Indicators
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via World Bank, using statistical databases and publications from national statistical offices, and UN and ESTAT publications. Accessed 15/01/2026.
3,535,603
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via CIA’s World Factbook: Eritrea. Accessed 15/01/2026.
$2,534
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via CIA’s World Factbook: Eritrea. Accessed 15/01/2026.
$700.00
2.9%
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via African Development Bank Group: African Economic Outlook (AEO) 2024.. Accessed 15/01/2026.
EXPLANATORY NOTES: No data available from reputable sources.
N/A
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via CIA’s World Factbook: Eritrea. Accessed 15/01/2026.
7.4%
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via US Census Bureau International Database (IDB). Accessed 16/01/2026.
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via World Bank, using United Nations Population Division database. Accessed 15/01/2026.
34.54%
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via CIA World Factbook. Accessed 15/01/2026.
5.60%
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via CIA World Factbook. Accessed 15/01/2026.
9.40%
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via
African Development Bank Group: African Economic Outlook (AEO) 2024. Accessed 15/01/2026.
50.00%
EXPLANATORY NOTES: Data via International Telecommunication Union (ITU) DataHub. Accessed 15/01/2026.
20.00%
EXPLANATORY NOTES: No data available from reputable sources
N/A
EXPLANATORY NOTES: No data available from reputable sources
N/A
No data available from reputable sources.
N/A
Industry Infrastructure
Collective Management Organisations
Authors & Publishers
None
Performers
None
Producers
None
Voluntary Joint Ventures & Umbrella entities for licensing users
None
Associations
Music Authors
Music Publishers
None
Music Performers
Sound Recording Producers/Labels
None
Other
None
Music Export Office
None
Joint Industry Body
None
Policies
Culture Policy/Strategy
Music Policy/Strategy
None
Legal Framework
Digital and Performance Rights Treaties
Other Treaties
National Copyright Legislation
National Treatment
-
N/A
Qualifying foreign authors enjoy protection concerning reproduction rights and performance rights. -
Eritrea protects foreign performers who reside in Eritrea, whose performances take place in Eritrea, are fixed in the protected phonogram or are incorporated in the protected broadcasts. Phonograms are protected if they are produced by a national of Eritrea, if the fixation took place in Eritrea and if it was published for the first time in Eritrea or in another country and simultaneously published in Eritrea within 30 days.
Qualifying foreign performers enjoy reproduction rights and performance rights. Qualifying foreign producers of phonograms enjoy reproduction rights. -
“National Treatment” refers to the assimilation of the treatment of foreign right holders to that of domestic right holders. It is a basic rule of most international conventions and mandates that foreign rights holders from contracting countries must receive the protection within any other contracting country as that country grants to its own nationals, ensuring equal rights under the scope of the relevant convention.
General national treatment obligations are set out in Article 5 of the Berne Convention and Article 2 of the Rome Convention, providing that the members of respective conventions must grant to each other’s nationals the rights provided in the convention. Berne Convention also extends the national treatment to “the rights which their respective laws do now or may hereafter grant to their nationals,” while Rome Convention members are not obliged to extend national treatment to the rights of performers and producers of phonograms which are accorded under their national law over and above the rights enshrined in the Rome Convention.
The criteria for eligibility for protection are provided in Article 3 of the Berne Convention and Articles 4 and 5 of the Rome Convention. With regards to national treatment of producers of phonograms, members of the Rome Convention may reserve the right not to apply either the criterion of fixation or that of publication of the phonogram.
As per WIPO, the total number of members to the key treaties above is as follows:
Berne Convention: 181 Members
Rome Convention: 98 Members
WIPO Copyright Treaty: 118 Members
WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty: 114 Members
TRIPS Agreement: 166 MembersThis is a high-level overview concerning national treatment of music authors, performers and producers of phonograms; for comprehensive and detailed provisions, refer to the laws of each country. The overview:
1) details only the criteria applicable to foreign rights holders, without including the broader set of qualification rules for domestic protection that do not concern them,
2) is limited to performance rights and digital exploitation of recorded music, including works and other protected objects:
- “Performance rights” include radio and TV broadcasting, public performance, and communication to the public,
- “Digital exploitation” includes reproduction rights, distribution rights, communication to the public and making available rights.
The term "based on reciprocity" used in the overview for some countries means that Country A will protect the works of authors or other right holders who are nationals of Country B that is not a member of treaties Country A is a party to, and whose works or other protected objects were first published outside of Country A, only if Country B offer similar copyright protection to Country A’s authors or other rights holders and works and other protected objects respectively first published in Country A.
The term "treaty" in the overview includes conventions and international agreements.
Music Consumption
Domestic Repertoire Quotas
No domestic repertoire quotas
Digital Streaming Services
GLOBAL STREAMING SERVICES
REGIONAL STREAMING SERVICES
DOMESTIC STREAMING SERVICES
None
Key Risks and Opportunities
Risks
Low GDP per capita and high poverty and inflation rates mean that the vast majority of the population has very limited disposable income for non-essential spending, which restricts the potential for direct revenue generation from music sales and subscriptions in the short to medium term.
Very low internet penetration restricts the viability of digital music business models.
Non-adherence to any of the international copyright treaties signifies a weak legal framework for protecting digital and performance rights, significantly increasing the risk of piracy and making it difficult for rights holders to monetise their work effectively.
Lack of CMO for authors, publishers, performers, or producers makes the collection of revenues for public performances, broadcasts, and digital use nearly impossible within the current domestic framework.
Opportunities
Nearly half the population is under the age of 20, with a total of 78% under 40, representing a solid future consumer base for music and creative content. Unlocking this potential, however, remains contingent upon addressing structural challenges, expanding digital access, and formalising a robust intellectual property framework to de-risk capital entry.